The United States - Safe Harbor, Snowden and Schrems I
Safe Harbor (Commission decision 26 July 2000) was a self-certification framework treated as adequate for EU-US transfers. Criticised for weak self-certification and lax FTC enforcement, it was undermined further by the 2013 Snowden revelations about NSA surveillance. Maximillian Schrems' complaint led the CJEU to invalidate Safe Harbor on 6 October 2015 (Schrems I).
Given the huge EU-US data flows, the DOC and Commission built Safe Harbor as a self-regulatory framework. The Commission's decision of 26 July 2000 treated the Safe Harbor Privacy Principles as adequate. Weaknesses: members skipped required annual compliance checks, and the FTC under-enforced compared with domestic cases.
The June 2013 Snowden disclosures about NSA mass surveillance damaged EU trust. The Parliament sought suspension; the Commission instead renegotiated, issuing 13 recommendations on four priorities - transparency, redress, enforcement and access to data by US authorities. The DOC accepted 12 of 13; the sticking point was the national-security exception being used only when strictly necessary and proportionate.
Maximillian Schrems complained to Ireland's DPC over Facebook Ireland's transfers. The case reached the CJEU, which on 6 October 2015 declared the Safe Harbor adequacy decision invalid.
Key terms - quick answers
What is “Safe Harbor”?
What is “FTC”?
What is “Schrems I”?
What is “CJEU”?
Sources and study method
This independent lesson uses active recall, spaced retrieval and scenario practice. Read the full study method.