Module 8, Employee data - legal layers, works councils & legal bases
Employee data sits under more than the GDPR: local data-protection AND employment law also apply, and these are not fully harmonised. Article 88 lets Member States set specific rules (including via collective agreements). can hold considerable power over employee-data processing, and consent is a difficult and unreliable basis because of the employer–employee power imbalance.
The GDPR is only one layer for employee data. Employers must also consider local data-protection law and employment law, which are not fully harmonised across Member States. Article 88 expressly lets Member States set their own rules on employee data - covering human dignity, legitimate interests, fundamental rights, transparency, intra-group transfers and monitoring.
are formed at a threshold (typically 30–50 employees). In some jurisdictions they have considerable power - an employer may need to notify, consult and seek approval before, say, introducing email monitoring. Works councils and trade unions must themselves comply with the GDPR.
- Fulfilment of the employment contract - e.g. bank details to pay salary.
- Legal obligation - e.g. sharing salary data with tax authorities.
- Legitimate interests - e.g. migrating data between systems; not available to public authorities for their tasks, must not be adverse to employees, cannot cover special-category data.
- Consent - difficult and unreliable because of the power imbalance; processing may be unlawful even if consent was given.
Employees may feel pressured to agree, so consent (employment) is rarely freely given. Prefer contract, legal obligation or legitimate interests - and treat explicit consent as a last resort for sensitive data.
Key terms - quick answers
What is “Article 88”?
What is “Works council”?
What is “Legitimate interests”?
What is “Consent (employment)”?
Sources and study method
This independent lesson uses active recall, spaced retrieval and scenario practice. Read the full study method.